(This
is a draft designed to be circulated to organisations and individuals in UK
education. Please suggest ways to improve
it factually or persuasively.)
It's
not the Minister's policy, but the Minister's power
UK Ministers of Education |
For 30 years there has been a stream
of directives from The Dept. for Education.
- SATs are on, and then off, then, maybe, on
again.
- Schools should be specialist, then academies
- GCSEs should be modular, then linear.
- A-levels are split into two parts, then
re-united.
- Schools can let students choose their GCSEs,
then we get EBacc
Each time we get a new initiative,
teachers (and unions) complain, campaign, sweat, get stressed, resign...
Every time the minister claims they
are trying to help students' learning. They are not evil people; they
genuinely believe their own thoughts. All the evidence, campaigning and resigning
that teachers do, simply reinforces their belief that they have to
make the change because teachers are resistant to the 'obvious' benefits of the
policy.
So, perhaps we should stop
campaigning on individual issues and get to the nub of the problem. The
Secretary of State for Education has not always had these powers. Many of
them date from the 1988 Education Reform Act.
Could we agree on a
political objective which would remove the powers and give them to an
independent body (perhaps modelled on the Office for Budget responsibility?
Here is an extract
from a July 2014 NAHT document 'Owning what is ours: a
manifesto for education'
"How we change
the system is almost as important as what is being changed. Too often change is
chaotic and hasty, which limits our ability to make it stick. The profession
and government become distracted by conflict over principles rather than
engaged in discussion around implementation.
We propose an ‘office
of educational responsibility’. This office will go beyond existing
proposals for evidence collection into planning and managing a five-year reform
programme.
This programme
would be agreed in advance and subject to rolling review. New proposals for
change will need to be submitted to the office for analysis against three
tests: evidence of impact, value for money and capacity to implement. It needs
to be difficult for ministers to depart from the programme. A high profile
chief education officer, coming from the profession, could lead the
office.
Politicians would
set principles, policies and outcomes. The profession would determine methods
and, subject to representation via the office, be able to implement defined and
tested policy in good faith."
Brian Lightman,
ASCL leader, suggests an independent body to make decisions about the school
curriculum and called for the end of schools having to follow the personal
"whims" of policymakers. (Mar 2015)
If a number of
teaching organisations could agree what we wanted, perhaps we could persuade
the present Sec. of State to close the door on future rapid change to existing
policies by creating such a body and handing over her powers.
Although it should
be modelled on the Office for Budget Responsibility, this body should not have
a similar name. The problem in education
is not irresponsibility; it is the constant changes based on little or no
evidence or experiment.
Dreaming? Why
not?
Unless we can get
these powers changed we will be stuck with a continuous round of
'initiatives' as new ministers make their mark on the job.
Mike Bell
EBTN
EBTN
Draft Dec 2015
An excellent idea, well worth debating, refining and promoting. (And thanks for the reminder that it hasn't always been like this.)
ReplyDeleteAn excellent suggestion.
ReplyDeleteIn September I sent every MP a booklet entitled "Who should determine national education policy?" It argues for a National Education Council of teachers, parents, business folk, trade union reps, academics, politicians. Such a Council should immediately ask "How can standards, teachers' morale, young people's well-being and parents' aspirations be raised?" From this they shouldesignAn excellent suggestion.
In September I sent every MP a booklet entitled "Who should determine national education policy?" It argues for a National Education Council of teachers, parents, business folk, trade union reps, academics, politicians. Such a Council should immediately ask "How can standards, teachers' morale, young people's well-being and parents' aspirations be raised?" From this they should produce a national education policy for Parliament to approve and, subsequently, ministers to implement. See http://www.free-school-from-government-control.com/National-Education-Council.html
Thank you for sharing Michael. I look forward to accessing the link provided. The morale of the teaching profession and the aspirations of our children are in dire need of rejuvenation. Reducing or removing Government interference would go some way in achieving this!
ReplyDelete